apparently the notion of video games with characters of differing sexual orientation is an issue these days. slaughter things all you like but don't do it in a gay fashion, esp if you're a character from star wars.
They also claim "there were no LGBT characters in any of the Star Wars movies". I don't know which wacky re-cut version of Star Wars they've been watching, but I saw the original when I was about six years old and even then I was struck by how outrageously camp C3PO is. He was a gilded John Inman in space. And what about Luke Skywalker? Apart from briefly kissing his own sister, he shows no interest in women whatsoever. The first film is a tender gay parable in which Luke falls in love with Alec Guinness and gradually "comes out" as a Jedi. The final scene oozes symbolism: having penetrated the Death Star's trench in his phallic spacecraft, he closes his eyes, submits to his true inner instinct and triumphantly blasts his X-Wing's seed into an anus-like aperture, causing an orgasmic eruption that changes his universe for ever. It's hard to see how they could make Star Wars any gayer, unless they gave the Millennium Falcon a handlebar moustache.
all of which would be just so funny if it wasn't happening against a backdrop of increase in homophobic attacks down south. as usual i am stunned by what people can get themselves worked up about. hurrah for charlie brooker tho.
Monday, 16 April 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
The idea of Star Wars as camp reminds me of the idea of SW as the best "art house" movie ever:
http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/dvdextras/2005/11/star_wars_episodesivi.html
(Man was that hard to find!)
that is very funny. but i'm still more willing to accept star wars as a sprawling gay epic than an act of post modern 'existential surrender'! lol
It's a sprawling gay epic of postmodern existential surrender! :-)
sounds about right. now what about that top gun...?
Post a Comment