Thursday 7 August 2008

george eliot

trapped in the house by rain, had enough of fixing bikes, waiting for paint to dry i'm thinking to myself that i've reached that nineteenth century time of the year again, time to read a zola or a dickens, then as if by magic i come across an excerpt from middlemarch on the radio...

Certainly those determining acts of her life were not ideally beautiful. They were the mixed result of young and noble impulse struggling amidst the conditions of an imperfect social state, in which great feelings will often take the aspect of error, and great faith the aspect of illusion. For there is no creature whose inward being is so strong that it is not greatly determined by what lies outside it. A new Theresa will hardly have the opportunity of reforming a conventual life, any more than a new Antigone will spend her heroic piety in daring all for the sake of a brother's burial: the medium in which their ardent deeds took shape is forever gone. But we insignificant people with our daily words and acts are preparing the lives of many Dorotheas, some of which may present a far sadder sacrifice than that of the Dorothea whose story we know.

Her finely touched spirit had still its fine issues, though they were not widely visible. Her full nature, like that river of which Cyrus broke the strength, spent itself in channels which had no great name on the earth. But the effect of her being on those around her was incalculably diffusive: for the growing good of the world is partly dependent on unhistoric acts; and that things are not so ill with you and me as they might have been, is half owing to the number who lived faithfully a hidden life, and rest in unvisited tombs.


i couldn't have read it when i was younger, didn't have the patience, didn't have the insight but, something like dickens (though i prefer eliot), i did realise that i probably would do later in life and it'd be worth the wait which, of course it was. i hear there arethose who haven't read it, who consider it long winded, boring etc. in the words of that great lost critic mr t - i pity the fool!

2 comments:

Roxana said...

oh for me it's different - I read them when I was young, now I fear to read them again because I might be disappointed, or discover that I lack the patience or the empathy I once had. but it is true that there are different 'ages' in one's life, for different kinds of books, and every person has his or her own chronology. I happened to stumble upon a book and think: what a pity I didn't discover it when I was 20, it would have been such a coup de foudre...

swiss said...

oh no, sometimes when i come across something i like these days i can just here myself when i was younger and it makes me cringe! lol those books i have read over the years (particularly the razor's edge and father and sons) interest me in the way that my views of them have changed